🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 448+ reviews
Vintage āœ“ In Stock šŸ”„ Bestseller

Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock

ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜… 4.6 out of 5 (448 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$20
$33.33
Sale
āœ“ on the house shipment on this item • Limited time offer

Vintage Semca wind up travel alarm Clark. Unsure if keeps accurate time, but cute vintage display piece

šŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
instantaneous Shipping
ā†©ļø
straightforward Returns

šŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock

Vintage Semca wind up travel alarm Clark. Unsure if keeps accurate time, but cute vintage display piece

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

šŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 605152

Category: Vintage > Electronics > Clocks

Original Price: $33.33 USD

Sale Price: $20 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 shipping & Returns

āœ“ no-cost shipment on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Based on 448 reviews
KC
Kayla Campbell āœ“ Verified
1 month ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
terrific Quality
After a few days, the Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock works fine which feels reasonable. Works fine so far.
MK
Megan King āœ“ Verified
1 month ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…​
fabulous Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock!
After a few days, the Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock feels solid and it meets expectations.
AC
Amber Carter āœ“ Verified
2 months ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
adore this Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock!
So far, it is practical which feels reasonable.
DC
Daniel Clark āœ“ Verified
1 month ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Exactly What I Needed
satisfactory and good price Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock.
JM
Jessica Moore āœ“ Verified
2 months ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
foremost Purchase Ever
At first, the Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock works fine so I’m okay with it. Works fine so far.