🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 251+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

NWOT costume ring sz 10.5

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.5 out of 5 (251 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$16​
$26.67
Sale
βœ“ on the house shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Red stone with halo nwot size 10.5

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
instantaneous Shipping
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

NWOT costume ring sz 10.5

Red stone with halo nwot size 10.5

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 825611

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Rings

Original Price: $26.67 USD

Sale Price: $16 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 shipping & Returns

βœ“ no-cost shipment on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.5
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 4812 reviews
JB
James Brown βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Philadelphia, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid NWOT costume ring sz 10.5
After certain use, the NWOT costume ring sz 10.5 works as described so I’m okay with it. Packaging was uncomplicated.
30 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Philadelphia, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding!
At first, the NWOT costume ring sz 10.5 feels solid which feels reasonable. Arrived on time.
49 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· San Antonio, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
treasure it!
splendid value purchase NWOT costume ring sz 10.5.
50 people found this helpful
JD
John Davidson βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
exceptional
To be fair, the NWOT costume ring sz 10.5 feels okay so I’m okay with it.
29 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· San Francisco, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
cherish this NWOT costume ring sz 10.5!
Bought another NWOT costume ring sz 10.5 because the first one was terrific.
33 people found this helpful